I am Speaking up!!!!!!

I am Speaking up!!!!!!
Me and My Knight

Wednesday, October 9, 2019

It’s in the blood

It’s in the blood

Despite – or perhaps because of – its importance, some of the world’s most deadly diseases have their roots in blood; it is arguably the place where we are at our most vulnerable. But there is a way we can capitalise on this – and, incredibly, says Dr George Frodsham it involves magnetic filtration…  

The Danger of Assisted Suicide Laws Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series National Council on Disability

The Danger of Assisted Suicide Laws- Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series- National Council on Disability
National Council on Disability (NCD)
1331 F Street NW, Suite 850
Washington, DC 20004
The Danger of Assisted Suicide Laws: Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series
National Council on Disability, October 9, 2019
 This report is also available in alternative formats. Please visit the National Council on Disability (NCD) website (www.ncd.gov) or contact NCD to request an alternative format using the following information: ncd@ncd.gov Email
 202-272-2004 Voice
202-272-2022 Fax
The views contained in this report do not necessarily represent those of the Administration, as this and all NCD documents are not subject to the A-19 Executive Branch review process.

National Council on Disability An independent federal agency making recommendations to the President and Congress to enhance the quality of life for all Americans with disabilities and their families. Letter of Transmittal October 9, 2019 The President The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: On behalf of the National Council on Disability (NCD), I am pleased to submit Assisted Suicide Laws and Their Danger to People with Disabilities, part of a five-report series on the intersection of disability and bioethics. This report, and the others in the series, focuses on how the historical and continued devaluation of the lives of people with disabilities by the medical community, legislators, researchers, and even health economists, perpetuates unequal access to medical care, including life-saving care. NCD has long opposed assisted suicide laws. In 1997, after a thorough review of the forms of discrimination people with disabilities experienced in American society, NCD issued Assisted Suicide: A Disability Perspective, opposing legalization of assisted suicide, concluding that the evidence indicated that the interests of the few people who would benefit from assisted suicide were “heavily outweighed by the probability that any law, procedures, and standards that can be imposed to regulate physician-assisted suicide will be misapplied to unnecessarily end the lives of people with disabilities.” Instead, NCD called for a comprehensive, fully-funded, system of assistive living services for people with disabilities. Eight years later, in 2005, reaffirmed its position opposing the legalization of assisted suicide. The nation had observed the implementation of the Oregon assisted suicide law, and the evolution of cultural attitudes toward so-called “mercy killing,” of both the medical and non-medical variety. Jack Kevorkian was convicted of second-degree murder for committing active euthanasia of a man with ALS, utilitarian euthanasia advocate Professor Peter Singer was hired for a prestigious bioethics chair at Princeton University, two movies favorably depicting euthanasia of people with quadriplegia won Oscars, and numerous courts upheld the right of a guardian to starve and dehydrate a severely brain injured but healthy woman in Florida. The dangers to people with disabilities based on the devaluation of their lives was ever clearer. Assisted Suicide Laws and their Danger to People with Disabilities reexamines the issue of assisted suicide in light of NCD’s prior reports, brings NCD’s earlier analysis up-to-date, and finds that the dangers and harms that NCD identified in 1997 and 2005 are at least as significant today. The report describes, among other things, a double standard in suicide prevention efforts where people with disabilities are not referred for mental health treatment when seeking assisted suicide, while people without disabilities receive such referrals. The report recommends steps that must be taken at the federal and state levels to ensure that people with disabilities have a system of assisted services and supports; that medical providers inform patients seeking assisted suicide of these supports; and that medical providers receive training in disability competency and disability-risk factors for suicide. NCD stands ready to assist the Administration, Congress and federal agencies to ensure that people with disabilities are not steered toward ending their lives due to a lack of supports and medical providers who are not required to help patients find alternatives.
Respectfully, Neil Romano
 Chairman

Please check out the Report at the above Link

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Today is the 29 Month Anniversary of My Husband, Bill Knightly's Medical Murder at St. Joseph's Hospital in Nashua, NH

                                       My Knight with two of his precious Granddaughters

29 Month's ago today, I lost the Love of My Life thank's St. Joseph's Hospital in Nashua, NH, where money means more than the lives of our Loved Ones. Where Hospice/Palliative care are ILLEGALLY forced onto patient's without their knowledge and OVERDOSED with Morphine. Where Medicare pay's the Fraudulent bills, because the Hospital Illegally reports the patient wasn't on Hospice/Palliative care, stating Medicare wasn't billed for Hospice/Palliative care. Well Legally he WAS'NT. ILLEGALLY he WAS. Isn't it true that Hospice/Palliative care is billed at a lower rate than standard Hospital care? So why would they admit he was forced onto it? Even CMS goes along with the Fraudulent bills, even after they received ALL proof that My Husband was indeed on Hospice/Palliative care and never treated for the illnesses found through almost daily lab work. How stupid can they be? They can see that he wasn't treated for anything. They can see he was OVERDOSED with Morphine. And IF they know how to read, it states right in his Medical file that he was put on Hospice and the bill's they paid were for a Hospice/Palliative care Doctor and Nurse Practitioner. Both of which we NEVER consented to, nor did we consent to the ILLEGAL DNR the Nurse Practitioner forced on him. Even the New Hampshire Board of Medicine admitted My Husband was DNR'D Illegally, yet the State of NH does NOTHING! Where do we turn when our Loved One's are being Medically Murdered and NO Lawyer will take our case because the State of NH has a cap of 150 grand? And then we have a new County Attorney and Attorney General who refuse to prosecute the Murderers! What is wrong with our Society today when lives no longer matter? When Money is the only thing that matter's anymore? There aren't many Doctor's left from yesteryear who really care about their patient's. Most of the Doctor's these day's care nothing about saving lives. All they care about is their ill begotten paycheck's.
Life still is no better without My Husband by my side. Every day is harder than the day before. Everything reminds me of him and the times we no longer spend together, thank's to St. Joes!
I Love you My Knight and Always will. No-one can EVER take your place. You were one of a kind. Simply the BEST. Even our Grandchildren tell me every day, DeDe was the best. That's what they call him. Every day they tell me how much they love and miss him. Life just isn't the same without him. It really sucks. I tell them one day we will all be together again in Heaven and he will never leave us again. Every night I pray that this is just a nightmare and that I'll wake up next to him in the morning, healthy like before St. Joes got their mitt's into him.

I Love you My Knight and always will! 
Extremely Pissed Off Wife of Bill Knightly, Murdered by NON-consensual Hospice/Palliative care at St. Joseph Hospital in Nashua, NH

Saturday, September 21, 2019

U.S. Government Report Shows Hospice Abuse. Sacrificing Patient Care for Profit.

U.S. Government Report Shows Hospice Abuse. Sacrificing Patient Care for Profit.

Groups opposing euthanasia and assisted suicide have been advocates of good hospice care. Stories about hospice abuse have created great concerns as we recognize that good care will reduce the demand for assisted dying while hospice abusive feeds the demand to legalize assisted suicide. Promoters of assisted suicide will often compare hospice care to assisted suicide and refer to hospice abuse to advocate for "more options" at the end of life.

The Trump Department of Health and Human Services’ Inspector General has released two scathing reports concerning the Hospice end-of-life-care industry, with the hope of cleaning up hospice abuse. These reports include stories of maggots in stomach feeding tubes; failing to clean wounds which ultimately became gangrened requiring leg amputations; ignoring pelvic injuries from sexual assault and giving wrong treatment that put patients in the hospital.

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Wyss Institute and Miraki Innovation Unveil BOA Biomedical to Reduce Sepsis Deaths

Wyss Institute and Miraki Innovation Unveil BOA Biomedical to Reduce Sepsis Deaths

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.Sept. 10, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- The Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University and Miraki Innovation have unveiled BOA Biomedical Inc., a company that aims to solve the global healthcare demand for a device that rapidly diagnoses and treats infectious diseases, focusing specifically on sepsis and antibiotic-resistant infections. BOA is a portfolio company founded by Miraki that plans to commercialize technology developed at the Wyss Institute. Earlier this year, BOA obtained investigational device exemption (IDE) from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration to allow the device to be used in a first-in-human clinical study to collect safety and effectiveness data. This approval follows BOA's exclusive worldwide licensing agreement with the Harvard Office of Technology Development.

Sunday, September 8, 2019

Continuous deep sedation and HOMICIDE: an unsolved problem in law and professional morality

Continuous deep sedation and homicide: an unsolved problem in law and professional morality

Abstract

When a severely suffering dying patient is deeply sedated, and this sedated condition is meant to continue until his death, the doctor involved often decides to abstain from artificially administering fluids. For this dual procedure almost all guidelines require that the patient should not have a life expectancy beyond a stipulated maximum of days (4–14). The reason obviously is that in case of a longer life-expectancy the patient may die from dehydration rather than from his lethal illness. But no guideline tells us how we should describe the dual procedure in case of a longer life-expectancy. Many arguments have been advanced why we should not consider it to be a form of homicide, that is, ending the life of the patient (with or without his request). I argue that none of these arguments, taken separately or jointly, is persuasive. When a commission, even one that is not itself life-shortening, foreseeably renders a person unable to undo the life-shortening effects of another, simultaneous omission, the commission and the omission together should be acknowledged to kill her. I discuss the legal and ethical implications of this conclusion.
Keywords: Continuous deep sedation, Double effect, Medical exception, Palliative sedation, Slow euthanasia, Withholding artificial hydration